immigration

The &;politically incorrect&; issue of whether or not a society such as a Australia has the right to control its population levels through immigration controls

About immigration

The example of the founding of Israel on the land occupied by Palestinians in 1947 shows that the right of communities to control who can and who cannot come into their land is an essential right for their wellbeing. However, this right has been taken away from many groups as well as the Palestinians, particularly in Anglophone countries such as Australia, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States. The results have been disastrous for the already less privileged – higher housing costs and lower wages, overcrowding, greater congestion on roads, higher costs to build infrastructure. In Australia, for example, the is to cost Victorians a staggering $14 billion for a mere 18 kilometeres of road as one example.

Obviously, each member of the community loses as result of population growth.

Kelvin Thomson: Unemployment to Rise - Time to Cut Migrant Worker Programs

The rapid increase in Australia’s migrant worker programs over the past decade has been justified with the claim that Australia is short of workers. This claim is now clearly false. The latest unemployment rise, along with the certainty of job losses at Holden, Ford and Qantas, and projections that the resources industry construction workforce will collapse over the next 4 years, shedding more than 78,000 jobs by 2018, make this clear.

We are now being told that the jobless rate will rise within about 18 months to 6.25% from the current 5.8%, and stay there through to the end of 2016-17!

This means more Australians will be out of work than at any time during the past decade, and far more than during the Global Financial Crisis, when unemployment peaked at 5.9%.

Last month unemployment increased by 3,400 to 712,500. Surely we must give the over 700,000 Australians who are out of work, and the Holden, Ford and Qantas workers who are going to lose their jobs, our priority.

We should reduce both the permanent migrant worker program and the temporary migrant worker programs to the levels they were 10 or 20 years ago. That way the jobs that will be created in the next 5 years will go to Australians who are out of work, or who face losing their jobs.

If we are fair dinkum about reducing unemployment, and fair dinkum about increasing workforce participation, we will cut migrant worker programs and build and use the skills of out-of-work Australians.

Kelvin Thomson

Pages